The shooting in Alexandria that wounded several individuals, including Rep. Steve Scalise, has put gun rights
back in the spotlight. In this this Wall Street Journal op-ed, author Daniel Lee makes the case for more individuals being armed to help prevent, or to more quickly respond to, attacks.
The attack on a group of Republican congressmen practicing for their annual baseball game against their Democratic colleagues is still breaking news. We know there have been serious injuries, including Rep. Steve Scalise, a congressional staffer, and at leats one member of Scalise's security detail.
Back in March, the Washington Post's fact checkers gave a "three Pinocchio" rating to statements from New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and the gun control group, Americans for Responsible Solutions, over gun suppressors.
The anti-gun crowd does not lack for determination, or hubris. But it does lack perspective (and a sense of humor). There is no better account of that than in this piece, which tells us of the anti-gunners'new crusade against squirt guns:
Former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg has expanded his anti-gun enterprise to include good old-fashioned propagandists. And they are already coming to a TV show near you:
Former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, a long-time financial backer of anti-Second Amendment causes and politicians, is prepared to unleash his checkbook again in 2018:
A columnist for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch has been suspended for...supporting the NRA and Second Amendment rights. The newspaper insists it's not because of those views, of course. But that justification just doesn't hold up under scrutiny:
We rarely look to authors at the Huffington Post for guidance on things constitutional. And with good reason, as this bizarre item on the Second Amendment makes clear.
A lawsuit against California's draconian "assault" weapons law is underway. And with good reason.